Empaths on the Autism Spectrum, part 1

Can I do this job?

In early 2006, I got a job working as an academic liaison for a group of 22 college-aged students on the Autism Spectrum. My job was to help the students with all of their academic needs: scheduling, counseling, learning accommodations, tutoring, social services, transportation … I was hired to create a total support system under and around the students so that they could successfully attend college. Before the job started, however, I had some serious research to do.

I’ve worked with and tutored physically disabled and learning disabled people for most of my life, but I had almost no experience with  autism or Asperger’s Syndrome. I knew a little bit (Rainman, sigh), but not enough to be able to truly help. So I got every book on autism and Asperger’s Syndrome at the public library and every book at the community college library, and I started from the ground up.

After fifteen or twenty books, I understood a great deal about the symptoms, history, approaches, and confusion surrounding diagnoses of autism or Asperger’s, which are quite distinct on paper, but are often diagnosed based on what kind of funding is available for each condition in each state, county, or school district. This means that the same child could be diagnosed with autism, Asperger’s, or PDD-NOS (Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified), depending on the supportive services available at the time of diagnosis.

Though autism and Asperger’s (and PDD-NOS) are presented as very different (though related) conditions, they are often mixed-and-matched by doctors, disability counselors, and schools, which is why I now use the term Autism Spectrum (and usually just Spectrum) instead of focusing on the subtypes. You can miss a great deal of crucial information about  individuals if you focus on a diagnosis that currently exists in a political battle zone.

2012 update: I now use the term Autistic and Autistic person, in deference to the civil rights workers within the Autism community who do not want to be called “a person with autism” or a “person who has autism,” because it treats autism as a disease and suggests that autism could be separated or subtracted from them. Instead, they prefer the neurodiversity-positive Autistic or Autistic person.

I learned a great deal on paper about Autism Spectrum conditions, but what jumped out most significantly for me was the repeated assertion that Autistics are not socially adept because they are “mind blind” and therefore unempathic. This hypothesis is championed by British psychopathology professor and researcher Simon Baron-Cohen, who theorizes that Spectrum conditions involve a lack of function in the mirror neurons that allegedly help us empathize with each other. Hmmmm.

As an empath — or a person who is aware that they read emotions, nuance, subtext, undercurrent, social space, relational behaviors, and gestural language to a greater degree than is deemed normal — I was a little bit unnerved. I wondered: Will I be meeting people who are my diametric opposites? Will I disturb or unsettle them with my overabundance of empathy? Will they feel unsafe and alien around me — or will I feel that way around them? How should I behave? Can I do this job?

As it usually happens with marginalized populations, the information I received from the academic and counseling-based books only gave me a small piece of the whole story. Those books were merely describing Autistic people from the outside, so I went back and got books by Autistics themselves (such as Donna Williams, Kamran Nazeer, Temple Grandin, and Sean Barron). These stunning autobiographies helped me understand more about how painful and confusing it had been for these people to grow up in what is called the neurotypical world.

Oh, how neurotypical of you

In order to avoid labeling Autistic people as damaged or abnormal, the word neurotypical was coined in the autism community to refer to people who were once called normal. (An aside: My father says that Normal people are the ones you don’t know very well yet.) The word neurotypical performs a kind of protective function that — in theory — neutralizes harmful language and treatment that might otherwise be directed at Autistics.

However, social behavior that is considered correct in the majority neurotypical culture (eye contact, speaking in turns, paying attention to what neurotypical people think is important, etc.) is called neurotypical too, which is really another way of saying that this is the expected and correct behavior. Using the word neurotypical as an adjective (neurotypical behavior, neurotypical gesture, etc.) is really not neutral in practice. It’s actually kind of oppressive.

I saw this almost immediately as I met with each student and his or her parents. The students were often coached — right in front of me — on how to behave, what I wanted to hear, how I wanted to be addressed … and this made me very uncomfortable. I heard a few of the parents use the word neurotypical as a kind of slam: “A neurotypical wouldn’t ignore a direct question, so wake up!” Ouch! I continually wondered, just who is unempathic here?

The concerns I had before I met these students really faded away as I witnessed constant (well-meaning?) insults to their personhood and dignity, and their tremendous struggle to find a way to belong in the neurotypical culture. Within a day or so, my new focus was on how to shield them from the everyday oppressions of neurotypical expectations. I began to talk about neurotypicals in joking ways: “Oh, how tedious and neurotypical that is!” Or I’d affect a Homer Simpson pie-loving voice and say, “Mmmmm, Asp-burgers!” as if it were the most delicious condition to have. It was a good laugh getter.

But more than that, it was an empathic entryway into the world of these students, who I almost immediately called my friends. These were people struggling mightily to live in a world where they weren’t welcome, understood, or in many cases, seen as real human beings. The mind-blind, unempathic caricature is a case in point.

The mind-blindness of everyday people

I knew from my early reading that Autistic people were allegedly mind-blind — that they didn’t have a functioning idea of the “otherness” of people, which meant that they thought everyone knew what they knew, liked what they liked, and thought how they thought. This mind-blindness, so the story goes, meant that Autistic people were unempathic, since the current and very simplistic definition of empathy is the capacity to feel (not think, not surmise, not guess, but feel) what another person might be feeling (if you’re interested in a more nuanced approach to empathy, primatologist Frans de Waal has a much better and more useful nested definition).

In my first few days with my new friends, I looked everywhere for this mind-blindness and this lack of empathy — but I didn’t find either one. I didn’t see any lack of sensitivity; in fact, I saw hypersensitivity — painful hypersensitivity. And I didn’t see mind-blindness either; instead, I saw a continual, time-lagged confusion about what was going on with and between neurotypicals.

I understand this confusion very well, because with my overabundance of empathy, I often find neurotypicals frustrating and emotionally incomprehensible. Here’s why:

The following are normal everyday behaviors among neurotypicals: lying about their feelings; avoiding sensitive subjects that are glaringly obvious; leaving important words unsaid; pretending to like things they don’t like; pretending they’re not feeling an emotion that they’re clearly feeling; using language to hide, obscure, and skirt crucial issues; attacking people who frighten them without ever realizing they’re full of fear; stopping all forward progress on a project without ever realizing they’re full of anger and grief; and claiming that they are being rational when huge steamy clouds of emotion are pouring out of them. Neurotypicals are often emotionally exhausting.

And here’s the big ugly secret: Neurotypical behavior isn’t empathic — in fact, it’s often counter-empathic and filled with noise, static, emotional absurdity, and confusion.

But even amidst all of this static and confusion, many of my Autistic friends were achingly, scathingly aware of the social world around them. I mean hilariously, dead-on aware, if you would only listen to them. In fact, they were as uncommonly aware of the social world as some of my wildly empathic friends were. What I saw in these people was not a lack of empathy, but a difficulty in dealing with an often-overwhelming sensory onslaught, from the outside world, from their struggle to decipher neurotypical social absurdities, and from inside their own brains.

My Autistic friends were incredibly sensitive to sounds (especially very quiet sounds that many neurotypicals can ignore), colors, patterns, vibrations, scents, the wind, movement (their own and that of the people around them), the feeling of their clothing, the sound of their own hair and their breathing, food, touch, numbers, animals, social space, social behavior, electronics, the movement of traffic, the movement of trees and birds, ideas, music, juxtapositions between voice and body movements, the bizarre, emotion-masking signaling neurotypicals call “normal behavior” … many of my friends were struggling to stand upright in turbulent and unmanageable currents of incoming stimuli that could not be stopped, bargained with, ignored, moderated, or organized.

In short, my Autistic friends were overwhelmingly, intensely, unremittingly, outrageously empathic — not merely in relation to emotions and social cues, but to every possible aspect of their environment.

My friends were essentially on fire most of the time, and this often created a great deal of emotional turmoil, as you can imagine. However, because they struggled with communication and socialization, it was hard for my friends to address or deal with their often intense reactions. Some would completely withdraw, some would try to connect to others by launching into monologues, some would engage in “stimming,” which is a repetitive action that can bring some sense of peace and control, and others would lash out. Being on the Spectrum is a very difficult thing when the world around you — with its constant noise, confusion, emotional inconsistency, and demands for attention — is built for neurotypicals who aren’t aware that everything is engineered for their comfort.

The mind-blindness of neurotypical privilege

The lack of awareness neurotypicals have — their blind acceptance of their world “the way it is,” without concern for the needs of others — is called privilege in sociology. For example, a young white man who lives in Northern California in 2011 and states that racism is no longer a problem is speaking from the ignorance of racial privilege. He may not be cruel or inherently racist himself, but from his social location, he cannot see or experience any direct racism; therefore, he mistakenly infers that racism doesn’t exist. Privilege is a form of mind-blindness that is, sadly, absolutely common in neurotypicals.

Neurotypical privilege relies upon the same unaware and insufficient reasoning as racial privilege does: So if I don’t experience the sound of the dryer next door as being extremely loud, then it shouldn’t bother you, and you certainly shouldn’t start rocking, flapping your hands, hitting yourself, or pulling out strands of your hair in order to deal with the aural overload. Or, if you know two people who have been fighting for months on end, and you clearly understand all of the issues that they’ve been ignoring, then you should never, ever speak aloud about it, because that’s not how we do things! It’s rude! Wake up and act like a neurotypical!

What? Ouch! This “normal” social behavior — this insensitive and emotionally incongruent behavior — is only deemed normal because neurotypicals agree that it is. Neurotypical social behavior isn’t objectively correct or better than any other way …. in fact, neurotypical functioning is tremendously problematic, and as I wrote above, it is often deeply unempathic as well.

Neurotypicals who learn to manage in the social world aren’t displaying signs of superior mind-sight, functioning mirror neurons, or a healthy dose of empathy. Neurotypicals — for whom mind-blindness and a lack of empathy are common, everyday behaviors — learn to manage because the neurotypical social world was created by them and for them.

Furthermore, this idea about mirror neurons being healthy in neurotypicals and unhealthy or deficient in Autistic people … it’s only a hypothesis; it’s not a fact. Mirror neurons are not fully understood yet, and it’s not clear whether the original findings in primate studies actually translate into human neurology. This 2008 paper points out eight problems in the mirror neuron hypothesis, and researchers are working to get to the bottom of the real story.

In 2010, neuroscientist Ilan Dinstein and colleagues performed an fMRI brainscan study on 13 autistic adults and 10 neurotypical adults to test whether the mirror neurons of autistic people are deficient, but he didn’t find any evidence that they were. The mirror neurons in the autistic adults were normal. You can see a video about the study here.

Dr. Marco Iacobini, a neuroscientist at UCLA who is a vocal proponent of the mirror neuron deficit hypothesis, thinks that a study with a total of 24 people isn’t large enough to draw conclusions from, but Dr. Dinstein disagrees:

Dinstein stands by his team’s conclusions. The number of participants he examined is typical for brain imaging studies, he says, and their autistic participants, though high-functioning, possessed the most extreme form of autism spectrum disorder, not milder forms such as Asperger’s syndrome.

He supports a different theory for autism: that it is the product of “noisy brain networks” that don’t communicate as predictably as those in normal people. He says his latest study offers support for this, as his team noticed more variability in the brain activity of people with autism, compared with controls.

He plans to probe this theory by searching for noise in other brain areas in people with autism. From NewScientist.

Noisy brain networks. Overwhelmed by incoming stimuli. Hypersensitive. Or, as I said above, “… overwhelmingly, intensely, unremittingly, outrageously empathic — not merely in relation to emotions and social cues, but to every possible aspect of their environment.” It seems that the real story of the Autism Spectrum is yet to be told, and you know what? It’s not going to be told by neurotypicals unless they learn to check their privilege at the door.

Here’s something that might help. This video is an awesome invitation into the inner life of a non-verbal autistic woman named Amanda Baggs (she posts on YouTube as silentmiaow). Her website is here (thanks to Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg for linking me to Amanda).

In the first part of the video, Amanda shows you her non-verbal language and the way she interacts with her environment. In the second part, Amanda uses a program that interprets her typing into speech so that she can explain her native language to neurotypicals.

Amanda writes: This is not a look-at-the-autie gawking freakshow as much as it is a statement about what gets considered thought, intelligence, personhood, language, and communication, and what does not.

Amanda’s mastery of both languages is awesome, as is her ability to explain the “constant conversations” she has with all parts of her environment. This is a powerful commentary on neurotypical privilege — and it’s a real lesson in empathy.

In part 2: Speaking directly with Simon Baron-Cohen.

This essay first appeared on the site AutismandEmpathy.com, a wonderful advocacy site created by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg. If you know or anyone you know is Autistic, you should got to AutismandEmpathy.com!

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 9th, 2011 at 11:59 pm and is filed under Autism Spectrum . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

34 Responses to “ Empaths on the Autism Spectrum, part 1 ”

  1. Sue says:

    Hi Karla,

    Thanks so much for this fascinating post. I’m looking forward to hearing more about your experiences. I *think* I am an empath … at the very least I am a highly sensitive person. My partner *we think* is Asperger’s, so this post really resonated for me :)

  2. Karla says:

    Hello Sue! Thanks for your response. Welcome to a fellow empath!

    On the sidebar in the Tags section, there’s a tag called Empathic Skills. You may want to browse through those posts for some help in dealing with the various issues we empaths face.

    In tomorrow’s post, I have a link to a site where you can take a test to find your autism score (though, of course, it’s not definitive!). It will be interesting to see what you get!

    Karla

  3. Beth Spencer says:

    Thankyou Karla, what a great article! I’ve been very interested lately in the connection between strong empathic traits, high sensitivity, and CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome). And in exploring these links I’ve often felt a kind of kinship with some people on ‘the spectrum’, which seemed odd given the stereotype that people with aspergers and autism lack empathy (as it’s often defined).
    Look forward to reading more of your work. (Do you have a kindle edition of your book on Emotions in the pipeline?) best wishes, Beth

  4. Karla says:

    Hi Beth!

    Yes, empaths are usually also highly sensitive people (as are people on the Spectrum!). It’s fascinating that the stereotype of Spectrum people as unempathic is so strong. What backward people we humans are sometimes!

    About the Kindle version: Yes, the book is available as a download. This page has a link to the digital version: http://karlamclaren.com/bookshop/books-and-audio/

  5. Karla says:

    Oh, Beth, thanks also for your note about the problems on Facebook with linking to articles here. I also have the problem, so I’m having my programmer check it out. It’s only on FB: I can link from Twitter and G+ just fine, so there’s a communications problem between FB and this site.

  6. Don Browne says:

    Regarding the Amanda video, there seems to be some controversy whether Amanda Baggs has created a hoax and is not really autistic. Info: http://abaggs.blogspot.com/

  7. Karla says:

    Hi Don, thanks. I was wondering why Amanda seemed to have disappeared after that video went viral, but I thought it might have been that people were attacking her. I read through that site, which seems to be primarily hearsay, but there’s enough troublesome info there (and the video isn’t integral to the piece) that I’m going to delete it and alert the person who first published this post.

  8. Rachel says:

    Karla,

    Amanda has not disappeared by any means. She blogs at https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/. And this “controversy” about Amanda is completely manufactured. I’m quite upset that you disappeared her from this piece rather than investigating what the woman has to say about herself, and what others have to say about her. She’s quite articulate on her own blog, and a quick Google search leads to this article in which she is featured:

    http://byliner.com/david-wolman/stories/the-truth-about-autism-scientists-reconsider-what-they-think-they-know

    A number of disability rights activists have worked with Amanda and respect her immensely. I have had nothing but excellent dealings with her, and I give her a lot of credit for continuing to speak out in the face of immense hostility.

    I understand your concerns about publishing something questionable, but when dealing with autistic and otherwise disabled people, it’s probably a bad idea to remove the person’s words from a post first and ask questions later. We’re pretty used to be silenced, and doubted, and told that we’re not really autistic or disabled when we break people’s stereotypes. We’re dismissed far too often, and that’s exactly what you’ve unintentionally acceded to here. I would have preferred that you had left Amanda’s video in the piece and emailed me about what was going on, as I could have given you some information about it without Amanda’s words being silenced. I hope you will return the piece to its original form.

  9. Karla says:

    Hi Rachel, thanks for being a reliable insider. I’ve restored Amanda’s video. You’re right that I should have contacted you first, and I appreciate the way you’ve articulated your anger and disappointment. The interwebs are fully of nasty stuff, and I try everyday not to be a part of spreading any of it, but clearly, I got some shit on my shoe and tracked it into the house.

    Thanks for being an awesome resource. I think I’ll leave the denier comment up, because people are going to come across it in other places and maybe not have any idea about what’s going on — as occurred for me. It’s good to have the rebuttal here.

    And it makes a wonderful point about neurotypicals being, sometimes, absolutely and inexcusably crap at empathy.

  10. Karla says:

    Hi Mark, thanks for writing! Are you connected at all to the autistic self-advocate community? It’s a wonderful resource that is working to present autism as a function of neurodiversity. During all that Autism Awareness noise last month, with the dehumanizing puzzle pieces and disease rhetoric, I hung out with the cool autistic people! Here are a few sites you might like:

    The Thinking Person’s Guide to Autism

    The Autistic Self Advocacy Network

    And here’s a wonderful piece by my friend Steve Silberman, who’s writing a book about autism and neurodiversity.

    I hope you like them!

  11. Mark says:

    This article explains why when I called people on what I saw in their faces or body language, I was always told I was wrong. This article is a game-changer for me and my wife. I am an HFA and she is a Super NT (Empath). We write a a blog (like everyone else, :) ) on our experience with my Asperger’s and our miscommunication. You’ve just cleared up my frustration over thinking I was crazy because I thought I was reading people wrong. Thank you.

    Mark and Michelle Hedges

  12. Linda Fisher says:

    Read your story Karla and your experiences remind me so much of my son. As a young boy he always seemed to walk his own path but following the divorce of me and his father he seemed to spiral. Thinking it was the divorce, I took him to a counselor then a psychologist and he was diagnosed all over the board: bi-polar, depressed, OCD, etc. None of this has ever really seemed to be him. He’s not depressed, he’s concerned and worries far more about others than himself. His ‘OCD’ is actually a way of self-soothing, as well as his need to avoid certain fabrics, environments and people. He’s extremely sensitive and insightful regarding other people and I always felt that his reclusiveness was not so much a desire to be isolated but to keep from being overwhelmed by all that he saw, felt and perceived. We finally went away from doctors and embraced who he is: a highly intelligent, loving and intensely insightful young man. Thanks for your sharing your experience, Linda

  13. Karla says:

    Linda, how lucky your son is to have you. Vive la difference!

    The new neurodiversity movement is very interesting to me, and it’s something your son might enjoy learning about. It’s a bit controversial, but since you’ve already decided to focus on him as an individual rather than trying to change him into someone he’s not, I think you’ll appreciate it: http://mikestanton.wordpress.com/my-autism-pages/what-is-neurodiversity/

  14. Susan says:

    Thank you for calling attention to empathic abilities of autists.
    The Intense World Syndrome-an alternative hypothesis for autism Henry Markram, Tania Rinaldi, Kamila Markram
    Frontiers in Neuroscience November 2007 Vol 1 issue 1
    may be interesting to you.

  15. Karla says:

    Thank you Susan, yes, I’ve read it and I like it! It’s a far more empathic and thoughtful take on the real interior lives of autistic people, and more robust than SBC’s basically pathologizing approach.

  16. Butterfly says:

    Finally.. things that we ASD-folks discuss on our forum
    ..And still most wonder if what they sense is normal! So sad!

    I notice it in my clients, working as a SALT & sensory input therapist, but also in myself (Aspy). First I was denied being tested: you work with kids, even teach them language and social skills..!! Than after the initial test which showed definite signs on all 3 levels.. So I found my own way!

    What happens if you constantly get pointed out how you should react: uncyclopedia..http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Neurotypical_syndrome thru the eyes of ASD..
    It has a bit of a sting..

    Books I love: Olga Bogdashina’s book on autistic sensory input. And the 2 books from Carol Stock Kranowitz (out of sync kid) It explains more of the background, why are we different..

    Please let everybody be different, be themselves. Respect each other..
    And it is ok to look at the behaviourisms, but dont judge.
    Ask yourself what might have caused that behaviour, stick with the facts.. don’t interpret! Behaviour = communication! So please don’t tell anyone to do/be different! Learn to read the other person instead of taking the easy route.. That’ll help and get rid off future behaviourisms far easier ;-)
    Love,

  17. Karla says:

    Thanks Butterfly! I love your respectful and empathic approach. Have you seen the writings of Julia Bascom at Just Stimming? I think you’ll really like her work. Here’s one of my favorite posts, Quiet Hands: http://juststimming.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/quiet-hands/

  18. Karla says:

    OMG – Neurotypical syndrome is hysterical! Let’s raise a whole buncha money to create a cure for it!!! We have got to stop this plague of NTs, or their bizarre emotional and social functioning might bring the world to the brink of ruin while polarized groups savage each other for no reason! (oh, wait) Sigh.

  19. Susie says:

    Hi Karla,
    I am a speech-language pathologist, who is trained in sensory integration, and I also have a learning disability and feel like, if tested, I could have Asperger’s. I have read your book “The Language of Emotions” and loved it! Your interest and input in Autism is much needed not only for the entire communication, but on a more personal not for me as a professional as well as an everyday human being. I often have trouble with being an empathist. I can’t tell if I was always like this or if I became like this. Not sure if that’s makes any sense to you… but where I am I going with this is.. what can I do or read to help with becoming a more empathic person? Or do I have to wait until Fall 2013? ;)
    Thank you in so many ways!!!

  20. Karla says:

    Hi Susie, and welcome to the empathy and autism spectrum! I’ll be posting excerpts from the book here and on my Facebook page, so there will be pieces available before next year. In fact, over on my Facebook page, I just posted my list of the 6 different dimensions of empathy, which I’m using as a frame for the book.

    I also posted my definition of empathy, and my definition of an empath, and I’ll paste them here:

    Empathy is a social and emotional skill that helps us feel and understand the emotions, circumstances, and needs of others, such that we can offer sensitive, perceptive, and appropriate communication and support.

    An empath is someone who is aware that he or she reads emotions, nuance, subtext, undercurrent, intentions, social space, interactions, relational behaviors, body language, and gestural language to a greater degree than is deemed normal.

    Did you read this piece by autistic advocate Julia Bascom in Psychology Today? It’s wonderful: Respecting Autism

  21. Eric says:

    Hi Karla,

    I am a Singaporean with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. I now conduct psychological assessments, and have read up on many topics including science, psychology and spirituality due to my personal interest. I also have my own unusual experiences, so I am aware of the many issues you raised.

    After I have reconnected with my emotions and instincts so that I could connect with others, I thought that I was the only person who has managed to do so and felt that I had a duty to share my discoveries with the world, and to build a bridge between the NT and Aspie cultures.

    I now realize that there are other people who have achieved what I have done, as well as many varieties of autistic consciousness which can be different from my own experience.

    I also have my doubts about theory of mind and some the mainstream theories, and I did my best to explain my best theories from my own experiences.

    - http://iautistic.com/autism-theories.php

    I am glad to read your refreshing perspectives, including that of Dr. Temple Grandin. I came upon this article while reading up about you, and the courageous decision you made in 2003.

    Thank you for your sharing and your courage!

  22. Karla says:

    Eric, thank you for your kind comments!

    Isn’t it amazing, how many autistic people are standing up and going – Hey! I’m a human with empathy and emotions!

    I love it! Have you connected with ASAN yet — they’re the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, and I think you’ll really enjoy their approach.

    Cheers!
    Karla

  23. Carrie says:

    Thank you Karla! I am an HSP (Highly Sensitive Person) and an Empath and my partner is, we think an Aspie. In spite of how well I tune into her, we have had many misunderstandings and she doesn’t always understand me. However, she says that she feels more connected to me than she has ever felt with any partner she has been with. I personally feel that is because we are twin flames, but that is another subject altogether. Unfortunately my Honey has been left or cheated on by everyone she has ever been with too (and I haven’t had such an easy time either) so we are working on trust issues.

    In most everything we have read thus far on AS, it seems it is talked about as if it is a handicap, but like you have pointed out, it seems that NT’s have more of a handicap than anyone on the spectrum.

    Thank you so much for sharing your work. I look forward to reading more!

  24. Monique says:

    Hello Karla,

    I have been learning so much from your blog and your original CD on Energetic Boundaries. Thank you very much for being so thorough and thorough in what you put out there.

    A question, is it possible for someone to be both Neuro Typical and exhibit signs of Autism, soothing behaviors, extreme sensitivity to fabrics, sounds, smells and high need for routine? For example the person sees ‘their sensitivity’ to be the ‘right’ one and completely discounts how another’s feelings and vehemently denies another’s sensitivity to particular sounds or smells.

    Your thoughts would be appreciated.

    Monique

  25. Karla says:

    Hi Monique,

    I’m neurotypical, but I’m as hyperempathic as an autistic person, plus I stim and rock, I love systems, and am highly sensitive to everything. Autism exists on a continuum, and neurodiversity advocates point out that many of the traits of autism are ones that typical people get shamed out of.

    You can see the shaming right out in the open if you do a “breaching experiment,” which comes from sociological research. Breaching is breaking a social rule — and if you do it right, you can see the underlying emotional rules that are at play, but are usually hidden. I did a breach inadvertently the other day at Safeway — I was holding a bunch of groceries in my arms and waiting in line, and rocking without even noticing it. Then the back of my right leg itched, so I reached up with my left foot and scratched it. A woman behind me said out loud, “Boy, you sure are fidgety.”

    Hah! Get your grimy shaming attempts off of my body, lady.

    The vehement denier you refer to may be trying to get the sensory-aware person back into compliance with unstated soci-emotional rules about what “normal” behavior is. There may be an unconscious and unaware, but well-meaning, intention to help the sensory-aware person fit in better. However, it isn’t helpful.

    It might be helpful to bring in the books on The Power of Introverts and the Highly Sensitive Person series to bolster the sensory-aware person’s position as a valid kind of human being.

    I hope that’s helpful! Rock on!

  26. Monique says:

    Karla,

    Wow, thank you for such a graphic example of your experience in the Safeway (interestingly name isn’t it?).

    I have continually been told “you are so sensitive” in a emotionally crushing way. As an attempt to get along in these recent years I diminished my sensitivity to the point I no longer became bother by because I couldn’t feel certain energy frequencies but learned that it also shut down my higher frequency sensors. I felt like I was walking in a fog all the time. Fortunately I am coming out it but as a result the sensitivity is switching back on in full.

    Interestingly, just this morning when I awoke I smelled something in the home (not physical smell) and felt allergic symptoms to it and immediately tried to talk myself out of what I was sensing because it couldn’t be understood by the other family member. Is it possible to become allergic to the energetic frequency of something?

    You provide such an amazing service, thank you! I am thinking of coming to your April event in Berkley it looks like it will be very healing.

    hugs dear another,

    Monique

  27. Karla says:

    I remember when a shift happened for me — when yet another person remarked on my capacity to identify emotional situations with, “Yeesh, you’re so sensitive.” My anger stood me right up, and I looked the person in the eye and said, “I’m exactly as sensitive as I need to be.” Without violence, just certainty. This is who and what I am.

    I think many of us gravitate toward (relatively) insensitive people in the hopes that we can upload their approach to the world. Nope. But if you’ve got a relatively insensitive person in your life who is respectfully aware of the differences between you, and who recognizes you as an unusual specimen, then there doesn’t have to be any undue conflict. However, if the relatively insensitive person thinks erroneously that his or her way of being is the default setting — and that everything else is some kind of aberration, then yuck.

    In my new book, I’m focusing on the quality of relationships for empathic and sensory-aware people, and the upshot is that they’re crucial for health and well-being. For an empath, whose natural habitat is relationships, unsatisfying or incompatible relationships are very destabilizing!

    There’s a wonderful and embarrassing book that I suggest for all empaths, called Are You the One for Me? by Barbara de Angelis. It’s a game changer, but yeesh, it’s a relationship book, and oy. However, this woman knocked it out of the ballpark.

  28. Monique says:

    Karla,

    I recall when I did and said something very similar “I am sensitive and I want to remain so!” Over time the insensitive person has come to respect and allow that sensitivity but still a huge part of me is unable to relax and let go in their presence.

    What an interesting phrase “for an empath whose natural habitat is relationship” I had no idea, but as I read it — it is so true for me. Your book sounds amazing as I know all too well how destabilizing it can be when someone denies “your experience of reality”.

    Thank you again for the confirming my ‘sensitive reality’ and the book recommendation!

    Monique

  29. Betsy says:

    Wow, this is cool.
    Learning about autism helps me embrace and “feel into” my own
    highly sensitive, empathic nature much more deeply. For most of my life I have denied,hated, feared and rejected it. At the same time, I always felt that I was living somewhere VERY NEAR the autism spectrum…so terribly sensitive and confused. I am glad awareness of autism is now entering my field…sounds like it would benefit me to spend some time here. Thanks Karla!
    ~Betsy

  30. Bill says:

    Thanks, Karla, for this post. Really helped me feel more compassionate towards those who have autism. And it’s right in line with what I’ve been learning recently about our own sensitivity and how most of the ‘neurotypicals’ are DEsensitized and therefore stupid-heads. :p

  31. Karla says:

    Yeah Bill, the over-stimulation that has become normal in everyday life is ridiculous. There are now “autism-friendly” days at some malls, theaters, and some Broadway shows, where things are quiet and lights are soothing and people can sit on the floor — and I’m all, “Hey wait, I want autism-friendly everything every day, everywhere.” Yes!

  32. Bill says:

    Haha, that is awesome. I would totally love that! They should just be called ‘human-friendly’ days.

  33. Dorothea says:

    Amanda’s video leads me to ask if you know of the language of Sacred Geometry, and how that might fit with learning the languages of Autism.

  34. Karla says:

    Hello Dorothea, no I don’t know about the geometry languages. But the work of understanding autistic people isn’t that hard, really. You just ask them! One of my favorite information sources is Karla Fisher, who runs Karla’s ASD Page on Facebook. She’s got pages and pages of astonishing information about autism from a real-world perspective, and she’s got the goods. She is autistic and she works with autistic youth and adults in the Portland area, and she’s amazing.

Leave a Reply